Friday, November 5, 2010

ASEAN

ASEAN (ay-zee-un)
Background:
            ASEAN was founded in 1967 by Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. ASEAN spans over an area of 4.46 million km, 3% of the total land area of Earth, with a population of approximately 600 million people, 8.8% of the world population. In 2010, its combined nominal GDP had grown to USD $1.8 trillion. If ASEAN was a single country, it would rank as the 9th largest economy in the world and the 3rd largest in Asia in terms of nominal GDP.  A common external preferential tariff scheme promotes the free flow of goods within ASEAN countries. ASEAN has concluded free trade agreements with China, Korea, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and most recently India. The EU is a potential in the future to have free trade agreements. Each country differs drastically on governments and how they function.
Resolutions:
1.      THB supports ASEAN.
2.      THB would participate in free trade with ASEAN.
3.      THBT ASEAN has failed.

PRO’s (+):

CON’s (-):
Ø  Myanmar (Burma) is one of the countries part of ASEAN. It is military-led and has problems allowing human rights to its citizens. ASEAN is endorsing lack of human rights.
Ø  This is a step in the right direction. Otherwise Myanmar would be worse off. ASEAN is helping Myanmar.
Ø  Countries that are involved sometimes cannot support themselves and are a burden on ASEAN and other countries.
Ø  These countries need help and ASEAN helps them develop.
Ø  Certain countries get trade benefits with ASEAN such as China, Korea, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and Thailand while other countries like US do not. That is not fair for a free market. Either open it up or close it. Playing favorites.
Ø  ASEAN provides benefits for countries to trade with. It increases economies of ASEAN countries making products and services cheaper because of no tax. Also, countries that trade are benefited as well. It’s a win win situation.
Ø  Not allowing states to be independent and join ASEAN because they need the economic help. ASEAN forces countries to participate because of the benefits. Forcing countries to join by making it so appealing they can’t say no.
Ø  Individual states chose if they want to join ASEAN countries. It is their choice.
Ø  Makes countries trades within each other instead of outside their group. Stuck to one way of trade with certain groups of people.
Ø  Again, no state is forced to do anything, it just benefits them depending on who they trade with.
Ø  Too diverse. Cultures. Faith. People. Way of life. Language. Traditions.
Ø  Working together helps each country advance according their pace.


























Summaries
a.      US sort of getting  involved in Myanmar government and expecting them to have fair election. A n election hasn’t happened since 1990 and when National League for Democracy (NLD)won but won, but was not allowed to take power by the military.
a.      Aung San Suu Kyi. She is the leader of trhe NLD and under house arrest. There is still no fair representation for this next election Nov 7.
a.      Many of Myanmar’s 50 million people live in poverty and suffer from ongoing human rights violations.
b.      Political prisoners now number over 2,200.
a.      “Thailand is Burma's largest trading partner, based largely on its gas imports, and is keen to enhance ties further. Abhisit Vejjajiva, the Thai prime minister, recently signed a $13 billion deal to build a port and industrial park at Tavoy with a rail link into Thailand. “
b.      China has also been an enthusiastic customer for Burma's natural resources - particularly gas, timber and gems, while India is reluctant to cede the field to its rival on narrow moral grounds. Both countries recognize that Burma could provide a natural trade corridor between the 1.3 billion people of China and the 1.2 billion in India.”
a.      “China has sent a strong signal that it would boost regional peace, stability and development in the spirit of cooperation and unity at the fifth East Asia Summit, said Qin Yaqing, deputy director of the Chinese Foreign Affairs University”
a.      United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, not bound by ASEAN's principle of non-interference in members' internal affairs, did speak up on the sidelines of regional talks Saturday.
b.      "The United States is concerned about the arrest and conviction of people for peaceful dissent, attacks on religious groups, and curbs on Internet freedom," Clinton said after meeting with Vietnamese leaders
a.      October 30th was the 2nd ASEAN-RUSSIA Summit. Both created a Joint Statement showing they will strengthen the relationship.
a.      The agreement between China and the ten-country Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) covers nearly 1.9 billion people.
b.      On January 1st the six richest ASEAN members eliminated remaining tariffs and barriers to investment on 90% of products. But the poorest four ASEAN members, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar, will not need to cut tariffs to the same levels till 2015.
a.      Although China's trade with South East Asia is far smaller than with the West, it is growing rapidly. Between 2003 and 2008, it more than tripled from $59.6bn (£37.5bn) to $192.5bn.
b.      China has already overtaken the US to become ASEAN's third largest trading partner, and will leap past Japan and the EU within the first few years of the new trade bloc, said Sundram Pushpanathan, the Deputy Secretary-General for the ASEAN Economic Community
c.       The new free trade zone has taken eight years to put together. However, some smaller countries, such as Indonesia and the Philippines have protested at the eleventh hour that they fear being swamped by a wave of Chinese goods.
d.      "In the short term there will be some adjustments that some countries have to make. Some local companies will lose their domestic market share but ultimately consumers will benefit," said Mr Pushpanathan.
a.      The group includes the ten ASEAN member states along with Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea.
b.      The United States and Russia have been invited to join, and will send representatives this year.
c.       The US is sending Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has been urged in recent days by human-rights advocates and US congressmen to put human rights on the summit's agenda.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Chapter 6

Excersise 1:

"Security is more important than privacy."

According to the Rasmussen Report, in 2008, 51% of Americans said that Security is more important than provacy. It is proven over and over again that Security in fact is more important than privacy. Brining up, 9/11 and how increased security may have stopped the 9/11 attack but in order to gain security American citizens would have to give up some privacy. There is a direct correlation between security and privacy. When security is increased privacy is decreasing. The better good of the whole is more important than the privacy. Without security there would be no privacy.


http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/january_2008/51_say_security_more_important_than_privacy

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Chapter 4: An Overview of Parlimentary Debate

Exercise 1:
Create 15 propostitions (5 fact - value - policy)

Fact:
1. Obesity is causes depression.
2. Smoking harms the environment.
3. America causes international economic problems.
4. Money causes happiness.
5. The government has failed America.

Value:
1. Men are stronger than women.
2. Jerry Springer is the funniest comedian.
3. Walking is better than running.
4. Laughing is healthier than exercise.
5. Homework is worse than physical pain.

Policy:
1. Abortion should not be legalized.
2. Marijuana should be legalized.
3. America should invade other countries.
4. The government should have less control.
5. Northwest should offer more scholarships and financial aid opportunities.

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Fallacy Hunt

BP Debate:
 
 This House Believes that acts of violence to protect the Environment souled be justified.
 
PM Speech
 
Fallacy #1
Comparing wars in the past to why violence should be okay in the future over the environment. ---This is a Logical Fallacy specifically False Analogy --- You cannot compare wars over people's lives such as WWI or WWII to justify having war over the environment. It's also foolish to make that argument since it would be just as harmful if not more harmful to have a war over the environment trying to protect certain parts of it.
 
Fallacy #2
Shell cooperation in Nigeria "flaring gas while drilling causing the people to have cancer." --- This is a Material Fallacy specifically Reference to authority. --- It is not common knowledge what goes on in Nigeria and how the gas companies operate. Also, that's a cute story with no credibility or authority.
 
Fallacy #3
Violence should be an option to protect the environment. --- This is a Logical Fallacy specifically common sense. --- You cannot fight evil with evil. To protect the environment using violence is an oxymoron to the goal that you want to accomplish.
 
Margaret Thatcher Speech
 
Fallacy #4
The opposition leader said that there is more teachers than ever before in UK school systems. --- This is a Material Fallacy specifically Sample unrepresentative. --- Margaret responded by explained how the population rose and how there are more students than ever before in school systems and in higher education, so that is not a credible positive attribute to give to the Opposition Leader.
 
Fallacy #5
Citizens owning houses are not better because of a particular story that a man is being evicted from his home because he cannot pay his mortgage. --- This is a Logical fallacy specifically Single Cause. --- This is one situation and one circumstances and that owning your own home is actually better for the economy.
 
 
Sources:
 
Assignment:
 
1. Describe the context of the speech or debate. Restate or quote the example. 2. Label the example as one of the fallacies or show what specific test of evidence that it violates. 3. Refute the fallacy, saying what you think is wrong with it. So, you should have five examples of fallacies and five ways to refute the fallacy.

Chapter 2 - Identifying and Testing Inductive Arguments

Exercise 2 - Russia: Moscow mayor fired.

Argument #1

Russia is regressing back to the days of Stalin.
Luzhkov was fired on the grounds of broken trust between President Medvedev. - No evidence was presented to the public for ground of termination.

Luzhkov served as Moscow's mayor for 18 years. He was more than qualified to stay in his position.

Russia is regressing backwards and the citizens need to be cautious.

Argument #2

President Medvedev has too much power and control.

President Medvedev dismissed Moscow's mayor of 18 years with no tangible proof.

Moscow's MayorLuzhkov believes it was because he was causing tension.

President Medvedev is exercising too much control and power.

Sources:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/09/29/russia.moscow.mayor/index.html
http://rt.com/Politics/2010-09-28/president-luzhkov-dismissal-moscow.html
http://rt.com/Politics/2010-09-09/russia-kremlin-mayor-response.html

Exercise 4 - Analogies

"Democracy does not work in a family. Parents should have the ultimate say because they are wiser and their children do not know what is best for themselves. Similarly the best form of government for a society is not a democratic one but one where the leaders are more like parents."

The interest between governement and citizens is vastly different than that of parents towards their children, which is love. Also, it is unrealistic to have a democracy about rules and things that are a must in a family. The parents need to hold that ultimate control.


Source:
http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/arg/analogy.php

Monday, September 6, 2010

Burden of Proof - Chapter 1

Exercise 2

 1. Sarah Palin at Restoring Honor Rally:

     Ethos - Her credibility for this speech was being the mother of a Marine.
     Pathos - She was passionate. It reflected in her voice fluctuation, hand gestures and body language.
     Logos - She used stories/past experiences of military veterans.

2. President Obama's Speech on End of Iraq War

    Ethos - His credibility is acting as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.
    Pathos - His emotions for the speech was not evident.
    Logos - His logic and reasoning was well spoken. He had many advisors supporting his decision and clearly stated the plan for the "End of the Iraq War."

3. Any Commercial - Old Spice

   Ethos - The credibility is coming from someone that uses the product.
   Pathos - His emotions are evident that he enjoys the product and what benifits he gets from it.
   Logos - His logic is that when you smell good you will ge the things you want and can only imagine.


Exercise 4:

 1. Major Premise: All Borisov's family members are smart.
     Minor Premise: I am a Borisov family member.
     Conclusion: I am smart.

2. Major Premise: Northwest costs $32,000 a year to attend.
    Minor Premise: I attend Northwest University.
    Conclusion: I owe $32,000.

3. Major Premise: Life is always changing.
    Minor Premise: I am living.
    Conclusion: I am always changing.

4. Major Premise: All people in this class have homework.
    Minor Premise: I am in this class.
    Conclusion: I have homework.

5. Major Premise: People that are crazy enough to think they can change the world actually do.
    Minor Premise: I am crazy enough to think that I can change the world.
    Conclusion: I can change the world.